CIC Parts Demonstration

CIC ChicagoMeeting (St. Charles) - July 1999

Prior to changing parts on the vehicle, the fit of the original parts were rated.
Then the original parts were replaced with off-the-shelf non-OEM and OEM parts.
Observers were unaware of the type of part they were rating. They were rated 1 to 5, 5 being best.
Reviewers were also asked, yes or no, if the parts were acceptable to sell to customers.

1996 Ford Contour

Comparative Summary

  # Responses Fit Finish Acceptability
Original Part RF Fender 15 3.53 3.87 62%
Original LF Fender 14 3.5 3.4 62%
Original Part RF Headlamp Assembly 15 3.8 4.5 75%
Part # 1 OE RF Fender 14 3.16 3.50 68%
Part # 2 OE LF Fender 14 3.14 3.80 61%
Part # 3 OE RF Headlamp 14 4.15 4.30 93%
Part # 4 Non-OE RF Fender 18 3.26 3.67 65%
Part # 5 Non-OE LF Fender 18 2.48 3.14 33%
Part # 6 Non-OE RF Headlamp 18 3.67 4.22 74%
OE Parts Overall 14
3.11 3.70 59%
Non-OE Parts Overall 18
3.02 3.57 55%
OE Sheetmetal Overall 14 3.21 3.58 67%
Non-OE Sheetmetal Overall 18 2.81 3.47 47%

2001 Part Demonstration Results 2000 Parts Demonstration Results 1999 Parts Demonstration Results
 Minneapolis- April 2001
1997 Ford Expedition
Orlando-December 2000
2001 Ford F150 pickup
Overall 1999 Results Page
  Nashville-September 2000
1998 Honda Civic
Minneapolis - September1999
Chevrolet Cavalier
  Toronto-July 2000
1997 Nissan Maxima
Chicago (St. Charles) - July 1999
1996 Ford Contour
  Kansas City -April 2000
1999 Ford Taurus
Palm Springs - Jan. 1999
1996 Ford Windstar Minivan

home